Publications - Truview EVO2™
|
|
An evaluation of the TruView EVO2™ laryngoscope
J.B.Li, Y.C.Xiong, X.L.Wang, X.H.Fan, Y.Li, H.Xu, Y.Ma1 and X.M.Deng
"Summery: The TruView EVO2™ laryngoscope was compared with the traditional Macintosh laryngoscope in 200 patients who required tracheal intubation for elective surgery. Mallampati score determined prior to laryngoscopy was significantly related to the view of the glottis during laryngoscopy for both laryngoscopes. The view of the larynx was better with the TruView EVO2™ laryngoscope than with the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with a Cormack and Lehane grade greater than 1 (p<0.01). The mean time to intubate was significantly shorter with the Macintosh laryngoscope (34s) than with the TruView EVO2™ laryngoscope (51s) (p<0.01)..." |
A comparison of the Truview blade with the Macintosh blade in adult patients
M.Barak, P.Philipchuck, P.Abecassis and Y.Katz
"Summery: The Truview blade facilitates a view of the vocal cords by indirect laryngoscopy. We prospectively compared the view obtained at laryngoscopy and intubating conditions of Truview (Group1) or Macintosh (Group2) blades in 170 patients who were scheduled to undergo general anaesthesia. We studied pre-operative airway evaluation, laryngoscopic view, duration of intubation, maximal force applied during intubation, anaesthetist’s estimation of intubation effort on a 1–3 scale, bleeding, teeth and soft tissue damage, and postoperative stridor and hoarseness..." |
Spanish Journal of Anesthesiology
Truview EVO review |








